Islamabad: In recent appearances on multiple private television channels, Bilawal Bhutto Zardari, Chairman of the Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP), discussed the critical need for constitutional reforms in Pakistan. He emphasized that the draft currently circulating regarding constitutional amendments is not the definitive version and underscored the importance of achieving a broad consensus, particularly with the support of Maulana Fazlur Rehman, to push forward any changes.
According to Pakistan Peoples Party, Chairman Zardari articulated that the draft amendments require extensive collaboration and approval processes involving not only the cabinet and the National Assembly but also key political allies. He highlighted the PPP’s long-standing commitment to judicial reforms, as outlined in their manifesto and the aspirations of the late Shaheed Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto, stressing the need for reforms to fulfill promises made in the Charter of Democracy.
Chairman Zardari explained the challenging dynamics within the Pakistani political landscape, particularly the difficulties in passing amendments without a two-thirds majority and the polarized environment that hinders bipartisan cooperation. He criticized the opposition for obstructive actions and comments, which have stalled progress on these critical reforms.
The discussions also covered the PPP’s strategies for negotiating with other political parties, including the JUI, to reach a consensus on the reforms. Zardari revealed that discussions with Maulana Fazlur Rehman had progressed the previous night, marking a pivotal step towards aligning the PPP’s and JUI’s drafts for a potential consensus document.
Furthermore, Chairman Zardari clarified misconceptions about the PPP’s stance on various issues, including the age limits for judicial appointments, highlighting that their focus remains on establishing constitutional courts rather than age-specific changes. He also touched upon the PPP’s historical challenges with judicial reforms and their commitment to a principled approach towards military courts and legislation affecting national security.